Last modified on 04/10/2011, 07:27 PM

Besides skulls and human bones, there are numerous signs of civilized societies before ours, like tools, implements, and other fossilized objects. Some of these artifacts are so old that science can't believe it. So, courageously, scientists look somewhere else.
« In 1844, sir David BrewsterThis well-known scottish physicist (1781-1868) founded the British Association for Science Progress, and made importantes discoveries in the optic field reported that a nail and a hammer has been discovered firmly sunk in a block of sandstone in the quarry of Kingoodie, at Mylnfield, Scotland. Dr. A. W. Medd, from the british centre for geolological research, informed us by mail in 1985, that this rock belonged to a "old inferior red sandstone » aged of 360 to 408 million years." » (source) Please note that the datationDatation is a constant problem. See Rene Descartes of this devonian sandstone, and so the hammer, corresponds exactly to the time when dinosaurs reign on Earth.
Did one of them lose it while repairing its house roof?

To be truly honest, we must say this: petrification could be a lot quicker than we usually think. At Trôô, near Montoire-sur-le-Loir, visitors can see a petrifying cave. They can lay down a nail there, or other wooden or metallic objects, and those ones are changed into stone in a few months time, thanks to both an accurate temperature and a wet atmosphere, saturated with alkaline or limestone vapors. But as far as we know, that's not the case in Kingoodie.

« There is, in a museum's dusty background, a feldstpath block which was found in 1869 in Abbey's mine, near Treasure City, Nevada, USA. Big as a fist, this amazing stone contained a 2-inch long metallic screw. We could disctinctly see its head and its regular body.

Iron-made, it got oxydized, but the heavy stone surrounding it had preserved its delicate outline. The problem is, the feldspath was estimated 20 million years older than man; this disturbing proofScience has became so dogmatic ! See La vérité sur notre âge was therefore sent to an academy in San Francisco, and science forgot it. » (source)

Spielberg must have imagining the last scene of Raiders of the Lost ArkSee Moses and the Ark by reading those pages. In a museum's dusty background, we can see a warehouseman pushing a waggon. On his waggon, carefully nailed down in an anonymous crate, is the Alliance Ark, which will go mouldy among hundreds of similar crates, irredeemably lost and forgotten.Click on + below

In 1885, in a german mine, a cubic object was found in a block of coal extracted from a 60 million year old layer. We could hold the object in one hand, a deep groove surrounded it in the middle. Studies showed that this smelting cube had been casted. But the scientific community decided to ignore it, as if it never existed.Click on + below Some researchers questioned the authenticity of its origin: couldn't it be made in a nowadays smelting works? (source)Fossil meteorite found in coal, C.Gurlt, Nature London, 11/11/1886, p.36 ; L'astronomie, 1886, p.463

In 1890, in California, mortar with pestle made of stone, spear points and a flint axe were found by J. H. Neale, road work operator for the Montezuma tunnel company. He discovered that in the gravel under lava while piercing the tunnel. These manufactured objects were located in 33 to 55 million year old geological layers. Of course, scientists dislikeClick on + below this stunning discovery and the object disappeared, probably on auction's occasion. (source)On the website impossible discoveries

It is all as if science were myopic. Or suffered from a selective blindness. It is all as if scientists lost their sensible way when entering the lab, and adopted the motto: « Here, we do not think. We research. » We could laugh about it, if it was not so ridiculous.Click on + below

In 1936, some excavations made at the borders between China and Tibet, in the Bayan-Kara-Ula mountain massif revealed 716 stone discs 1 to 1.7 feet in diameter. These discs, pierced in the middle, looked like modern vinyl discs. A groove was spiraling them from edges to center. They were estimated 12 000 years old and they held metal marks.

« Dr. Vyacheslav Zaitsev reported this could be writing signs and that these discs vibrated in certain conditions as if they carried an electric charge. The whole report about these discs is preserved in the Historical Archives in Taipeh, Taiwan, and in the Academy of Pekin. » (source)Top Secret, the website Antediluvian DVDs, how amazing, but we can see remains of more ancient technologies: the mysterious balls in South Africa.

In South Africa, near Ottosdal, miners excavated in 30 years time almost 200 metallic round objects. Drs McIver and Bisshoff, geological experts, studied these objects: they are flat spheres with an average diameter of 1 to 4 inches, blue as steel, with red reflections and little white grooves. They are made of steel and nickel, in a way that cannot be found in nature, so they are no meteorites, but true artifacts.

Some of them, accidentally broken, were made of a spongy material, transforming into dust in contact with air. They were extracted from a 2.8 to 3 billion years old geological layer, being confirmed by isotopic datation. 3 billion years ago, our plante was still a child. If life had appeared then, it was in unicellular form. So where do these undenyable artifacts come from?

Science considers them as singularities: nobody excepts them entering any scientific theory. It would lead to a distortion of the usual concepts, what would be unconceivable. Generally, 'serious' researchers manage to lost such embarrassing singularities.Sometimes with a big crunch, as you can see in the short novel Quatre pas dans l'avenir

This time, it was fortunately not the case. The mysterious balls are displayed at the south african museum in Klerksdorp, where everyone can admire them. R. Marx, the museum curator, made this stunning statement about them: « Mysteriously, whereas they are imprisoned in their display cabinet, they still spin around slowly. » (source)On the website impossible discoveries
"The best way to find no proof
is not looking for them."
Pierre Guérin