Homo erectus, our ancestor? Science says yes, but this answer is not science : just an opinion, not quite justified indeed. Several Homo sapiens'See Homo sapiens fossils could be dated far more previously.

"How old man is we cannot even faintly guess. One thing however is a biologically certain fact: he is by no means of recent extraction, but of extremely ancient age. (...) Man's descent is shrouded in mystery: it is an unbroken succession of missing links! The lateral branches of the primates were lopped off on some half a dozen occasions in the Earth's history; and only these reveal to us their earlier forms." (source)Bellamy, Moon, Myth and Man

That is the record of our scientific knowledge. This text was written more than seventy years. But in the long time interval, the state of our scientific knowledge of our origin has been little progress. A theory that does not work, sooner or later, must be abandoned. This is a scientific law as well as a bloody evidence. I mean if you care about efficiency, which does seem to be the case for followers of DarwinSee Dépasser Darwin... who doubted the validity of his own theory!

360 Million Years Biped Skull

The extremely ancient descent of man, based on facts and fossils, is a cat among the pigeons for paleo-anthropologists. Some snipers, challenging DarwinSee Dépasser Darwin and his theory of evolution,See L'évolution en question  think that Hominidae are posterior to 'modern' man. To them, our origin is far more previous.See The Law of Amnesia We keep on going further. "All has been said, and we arrive too late since 7000 years that men has been existing and thinking" said La Bruyere.in its "Characters" Two centuries later, Homo sapiens sapiens' age jumped from 7000 to 150,000 years.

In this way, we are billion years old in three centuries.

`

Despite the cult of Darwin, several fossils of Homo sapiens have been found in geological layers aged of several thousands of years. But because of the cult of Darwin, as age of those fossils went against the dogma, they have been lost or given to collectors. David Childress cites fossils of modern man aged of 300 000 years, 500 000 years and even one million years. Other authors as Andrew Tomas, Michael Cremo, William Corliss, Frank Edwards… talk about five million years and more.

The website Impossible Discoveries, faithful to its function of pioneer, gave us this new scoop: "In 1842, a human skull, bad preserved, was found in a 15 to 50 million year old lignite. This object is part of the collection of Freiberg's mining academy in Germany. In july 2005, M. Mohammed Zaraouit discovered in a marble quarry at Tafilalet, Morocco, in a devonian geological layer, a little fossilized crane belonging to a primate, who must be biped and aged of 360 million years." (source)Sur le site ldi5

200 Million Years Modern Shoes

Magazines like Nexus or Top Secret regularly broadcast informations like that. Like those 200 million years old human footprints. The fossil shows the sole of a modern shoe. We can see distinctly the deeper mark of the heel. Those amazing imprints are still visible at Paluxy River's site, near Glenn Rose, Texas, USA. In 1988, Dr Hans ZillmerIn his book "Darwin's mistake" cites some disconcerting discoveriesClick on > below of the same type, so did Michael Cremo in his book Forbidden Archeology.

Guess what the anthropologists said about these books? Nothing.

However, when facing such evidences, we feel dizzy. And shocked. Not only DarwinSee Dépasser Darwin made a mistake on our origins,See L'évolution en question which were long before than he thinks they are, but we are even more amazed to see history repeating: soles of modern shoes 200 million years ago! So when did history really start? Will science move our origins back in time more and more, until reaching their limits, those of matter? So that we can assert than man comes neither from ape, nor from any known Hominidae, it has already been said.

Darwin couldn't have made mistakes everywhere, neither could his paleo-anthropologist fans for 150 years now. Dates of other Hominidae's apparition may be right. In that case, neither Homo erectus nor Homo faber would be our ancestors, but other species appeared far more after us.See Homo sapiens sapiens In a time of very developed science? The shock we felt discovering those modern shoe soles with distinct mark of the heel seriously incite us to review the old clichés about prehistory.See Ovni préhistorique

How old are we, at the long last?

Long time ago, a very developed worldwide civilization asked brilliant geneticists to create intelligent beings. They needed hard workers in the fields and mines, says the Sumerian genesis.See La source assyrienne The gods created a variety of lower beings to serve them. According to Sumer's tradition, we are those flunkeys.See L'Adam de Sumer If there is a real danger of taking for granted theories and beliefs of science, the danger is bigger to follow any myth literally. Understanding of any particular myth suppose a vast experience and a real knowledge of hundreds of extremely ancient -and odd- mythologies.

These amazing stories asked new questions, more and more interesting and exciting, concerning our origin, the presence of giant hominidae, and of course the real age of man. Of course science remains totally silent about that,Sometimes not. Click here because the only valid theory, i.e. Darwin's evolution, grew so mixed up in contradictions and creeds, in a process as ridiculous and very similar to creationist blinkers. Will paleo-anthropology perform its quantical revolution some day? Sooner or later, will it join metaphysics through the quantic field theory? Will it dare going further, up to more and more vanishing ages, more and more ontological times?

Remember You Are God Inside

 Once upon a time when time didn't exist, in the dawn of world the spirit was first embodied, feeling dizzy with the new powers given by matter. The creating spirit took different physical bodies, sometimes mixing man with animal,See Animal, on est mal and often using huge sizes.Lisez L'empreinte des géants And you are, I am, we all are part of the creating spirit.

'There is no difference of nature between man and god, just a difference of degree.' (source)Stephen Kervor Remember you are god, you get the same nature as gods, and by you everything was created.

Even if we often forget it, we are made of light, and this light is stranger to science. Edgar CayceSee Edgar Cayce evokes these times on Earth before Adam,See Adam saga when men were spirit projections, when body, less material than the present one, had both sexes inside. He dated this first incarnation of ten million five hundred thousands years. So where do that 200 million year old footsteps come from? How could we trust  these dates?Uneasy to affirm such a thing. See L'excès rationaliste Let's explore these tracks in the coming pages, be patient, answers will come soon. From yourself.

Facing such spaces of eternity, no doubt the reason is not the best investigation tool. Neither is the scientific process, nor any dogmatism. Another way has been existing for millenia. "To discover something about man, we must not go to the geologist, who can only show us a couple of jaws and an empty brainpan or two, reliquiae of unlucky wretches who perished in the last stages of the cataclysm, the Great Flood or Deluge, or at the time when Luna became the new moon of our Earth.

We must rather go to the mythologist, the quiet collector of 'cosmic fiction', who has not been taken seriously up till now, for the true meaning of the reports that have been handed down to us for time immemorial." (source)Bellamy, Moon, Myth and Man From the time this text was written, the status of the mythologist, alas, has not improved. Worse, the all-powerful neo-Darwinians criticized violently mythologists. Fantasy and bias are our dogmas, they said. Sure to be more scientific than these new priests, mythologists will stick to their specialty.

Pass for an idiot

in the eyes of a fool
is a delight of gourmet.
George Courteline